Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Raines et al
Filing
35
ORDER: On August 27, 2015, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation DE: 22 , to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, the plaintiff's Motion to Pay Funds Into the Court and for Order of Dismissal With Prejudice DE: 19 is GRANTED. The plaintiff may pay into the court the remaining benefits and, upon so doing, it is hereby ORDERED that any claims against the plaintiff are dismissed with prejudice. This case is returned to the magistrate for further handling under the original referral order. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 9/21/15. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(am)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY,
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
JERRY W. RAINES, DONNA G. PURCELL,
)
CHRISTIE L. RAINES, AND WANDA S. SMITH, )
)
Defendants.
)
Civil No. 3:15-cv-00076
Judge Trauger
Magistrate Judge Knowles
ORDER
On August 27, 2015, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (DE
#22), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is
therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For
the reasons expressed therein, the plaintiff’s Motion to Pay Funds Into the Court and for Order of
Dismissal With Prejudice (DE #19) is GRANTED. The plaintiff may pay into the court the
remaining benefits and, upon so doing, it is hereby ORDERED that any claims against the
plaintiff are dismissed with prejudice. This case is returned to the magistrate for further handling
under the original referral order.
It is so ORDERED.
ENTER this 21st day of September 2015.
________________________________
ALETA A. TRAUGER
U.S. District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?