Batts v. Metropolitan Sheriff's Department et al

Filing 93

ORDER: Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Docket Entry No. 85) to deny Plaintiffs notices (Docket Entry Nos. 82 and 83), construed as motions for leave to file a supplemental complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(d). Plaintiff has not filed an objection. After de novo review, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED, and Plaintiff's notices (Docket Entry Nos. 82 and 83), construed as motions for leave to file a supplemental complaint, are DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge William J. Haynes, Jr on 12/8/2015. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(jw)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
)
)
)
)
)
)

ANTIONIO M. BATTS,
Plaintiff,

v.
METROPOLITAN SHERIFF'S
DEPARTMENT, et al.,
Defendants.

No. 3-15-0077
Senior Judge Haynes

)
)
)
)
ORDER

Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Docket Entry No.
85) to deny Plaintiffs notices (Docket Entry Nos. 82 and 83), construed as motions for leave to file
a supplemental complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(d). Plaintiff has not filed an objection.
After de novo review, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED, and Plaintiffs notices
(Docket Entry Nos. 82 and 83), construed as motions for leave to file a supplemental complaint, are

DENIED.
It is so ORDERED.

ENTERED this the

~f December, 201