Fisher v. Gates et al
Filing
65
ORDER: Accordingly, (1) the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 62) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED; (2) Defendants' Motion to Vacate Entry of Default (Doc. No. 55) is GRANTED with respect to the entry of default as to Christopher Gates i ndividually, but DENIED as to corporate Defendant Gates Construction and Design, LLC; (3) Plaintiffs First Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. No. 61) is GRANTED solely as to Gates Construction and Design, LLC.; and (4) a DEFAULT JUDGMENT is h ereby entered against Gates Construction and Design, LLC. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 5/16/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
DONALD W. FISHER,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
CHRISTOPHER GATES AND GATES )
CONSTRUCTION AND DESIGN, LLC, )
)
Defendants.
)
No. 3:15-cv-00127
CHIEF JUDGE CRENSHAW
ORDER
Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 62) from Magistrate
Judge Frensley to which no objections have been filed. Having undertaken de novo review in
accordance with Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court agrees with the
recommended disposition.
Accordingly, (1) the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 62) is hereby ACCEPTED and
APPROVED; (2) Defendants’ Motion to Vacate Entry of Default (Doc. No. 55) is GRANTED with
respect to the entry of default as to Christopher Gates individually, but DENIED as to corporate
Defendant Gates Construction and Design, LLC; (3) Plaintiff’s First Motion for Default Judgment
(Doc. No. 61) is GRANTED solely as to Gates Construction and Design, LLC.; and (4) a
DEFAULT JUDGMENT is hereby entered against Gates Construction and Design, LLC.
It is SO ORDERED.
__________________________________________
WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR.
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?