Wilson v. Montgomery Co. Jail et al

Filing 34

ORDER: The R & R 29 is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 22 is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of the Court shall enter a final judgment in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 5/5/16. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION LORENZOE WILSON, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. JOHN FUSON, Defendant. No. 3:15-000182 Judge Sharp ORDER The Magistrate Judge has entered a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) (Docket No. 29) recommending that Defendant’s unopposed Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 22) be granted. No objections have been filed to the R & R. Having conducted de novo review in accordance with Rule 72 of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, the Court agrees with the recommended disposition. Not only did Plaintiff not respond to the Motion for Summary Judgment as required by the federal rules and this Court’s local rules, he has wholly failed to show that Defendant Fuson either directly participated in the activity that allegedly violated Plaintiff’s constitutional rights, or personally authorized, approved, or acquiesced in such activity. Accordingly, the Court rules as follows: (1) The R & R (Docket No. 29) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED; (2) Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 22) is hereby GRANTED; and (3) Plaintiff’s claims are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of the Court shall enter a final judgment in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. It is SO ORDERED. ____________________________________ KEVIN H. SHARP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?