Stokes v. Transtar Autobody Technologies, Inc.

Filing 25

ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, Defendant Transtar Autobody Technology, Inc.'s Motion for Summary 22 is hereby GRANTED and Plaintiff Amy C. Stokes' claims are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of the Court shall enter final judgment in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 7/28/16. (dt)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
AMY C. STOKES,
Plaintiff,
v.
TRANSTAR AUTOBODY
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 3:15-00463
Judge Sharp

ORDER
For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, Defendant Transtar Autobody
Technology, Inc.’s Motion for Summary (Docket No. 22) is hereby GRANTED and Plaintiff Amy
C. Stokes’ claims are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
The Clerk of the Court shall enter final judgment in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure.
It is SO ORDERED.
____________________________________
KEVIN H. SHARP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE