Cunningham v. Park Lane Digital Media et al

Filing 66

ORDER: On July 25, 2017, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 65), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions o f law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Set Aside the Finding of Default and to Vacate Order Granting Default Judgment filed by defendants Dazzo and Lexington Doc Prep, LLC (Docket No. 4 2) is GRANTED, and the default judgment entered against them is hereby VACATED. The plaintiff's subsequent service on the defendants is in compliance with Rule 4(m), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 8/14/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (jw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION CRAIG CUNNINGHAM, Plaintiff, v. LEXINGTON DOC PREP, LLC, MICHAEL DAZZO, DANIEL LYNCH, AND JOHN/JANE DOE 1-5 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 3:15-cv-00467 Judge Trauger ORDER On July 25, 2017, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 65), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Set Aside the Finding of Default and to Vacate Order Granting Default Judgment filed by defendants Dazzo and Lexington Doc Prep, LLC (Docket No. 42) is GRANTED, and the default judgment entered against them is hereby VACATED. The plaintiff’s subsequent service on the defendants is in compliance with Rule 4(m), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. It is so ORDERED. ENTER this 14th day of August 2017. ________________________________ ALETA A. TRAUGER U.S. District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?