Muse v. Harper et al
ORDER: The Report and Recommendation 46 is ADOPTED. Accordingly, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 35 is GRANTED. Plaintiff's § 1983 claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's defamation and slander claims are DISMISSED WIT H PREJUDICE. The remainder of Plaintiff's state law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 8/23/17. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
DAVID HARPER, et al.,
CHIEF JUDGE CRENSHAW
Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc.
No. 46), to which Plaintiff did not object. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation
and conducted a de novo review of the record. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED.
Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 35) is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s §
1983 claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff’s defamation and slander claims
are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The remainder of Plaintiff’s state law claims are
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). The Clerk shall enter judgment
in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58.
The Court CERTIFIES that an appeal taken in forma pauperis from this Order would not
be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR.
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?