Duke v. Social Security Administration

Filing 19

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Court hereby rules as follows: (1) The Report and Recommendation (Docket Entry No. 18) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED; (2) Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Docket Entry No. 14 ) is hereby DENIED, and the Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED; and (3) This case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk is directed to enter Judgment in a separate document in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 9/14/2016. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION RITA DUKE, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:15-cv-00645 Judge Sharp Magistrate Judge Bryant ORDER Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) of the Magistrate Judge, recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Docket Entry No. 14) be denied. (Docket Entry No. 18). No response in opposition was filed to the R & R. Having thoroughly reviewed the record in this case and the applicable law in accordance with Rule 72(b), the Court will accept the R & R of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the Court hereby rules as follows: (1) The Report and Recommendation (Docket Entry No. 18) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED; (2) Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Docket Entry No. 14) is hereby DENIED, and the Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED; and (3) This case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk is directed to enter Judgment in a separate document in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. 1 It is SO ORDERED. _________________________________________ KEVIN H. SHARP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?