Zirker v. Southern Health Partners et al
Filing
55
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Having conducted a de novo review in accordance with Rule 72, the Court will accept the disposition set forth in the R & R. Accordingly, the Court rules as follows: (1) The R & R (Docket No. 50 ) is here by ACCEPTED and APPROVED; (2) This action is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk of the Court shall enter Final Judgment in a separate document in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. It is SO ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 1/12/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
VINCENT ZIRKER,
Plaintiff,
v.
SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS,
ET AL.,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 3:15-0724
Judge Sharp
ORDER
Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) of the Magistrate
Judge (Docket No. 50), recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice pursuant
to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Neither party has filed any objections to
the Magistrate Judge’s R & R.
Where no objections are made to the R & R, “[t]he district judge may accept, reject, or
modify the recommended disposition; receive further evidence; or return the matter to the
magistrate judge with instructions.” FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b).
Having conducted a de novo review in accordance with Rule 72, the Court will accept the
disposition set forth in the R & R. Accordingly, the Court rules as follows:
(1) The R & R (Docket No. 50) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED;
(2) This action is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
The Clerk of the Court shall enter Final Judgment in a separate document in accordance with
Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
It is SO ORDERED.
_________________________________________
KEVIN H. SHARP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?