U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Maverick Asset Management, LLC et al
Filing
78
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT: Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation 77 is ADOPTED. It is further ORDERED that the government's motio n for entry of default judgment against defendants Maverick Asset Management, LLC and Jason Castenir 72 is GRANTED, and a judgment against those defendants separately shall enter. Signed by Judge David M. Lawson on 1/16/2018. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg) Modified text on 1/16/2018 (mg).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
UNITED STATES COMMODITY
FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case Number 15-00928
Honorable David M. Lawson
Magistrate Judge Joe Brown
MAVERICK ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC,
RODNEY SCOTT PHELPS, and JASON T.
CASTENIR,
Defendants.
_____________________________________/
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
AND GRANTING MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT
This matter is before the Court on the report issued on November 19, 2017 by Magistrate
Judge Joe Brown pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), recommending that the Court grant the
government’s amended motion for entry of default judgment and enter judgment in favor of the
plaintiff against defendants Maverick Asset Management, LLC and Jason Castenir. The magistrate
judge’s report explicitly stated that the parties to this action could object to and seek review of the
recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report. However, no objections have been
filed, and the time for filing them has lapsed. The defendants’ failure to file objections to the report
and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Fed’n of Teachers Local
231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). The failure to object to the magistrate judge’s report also
releases the Court from its duty independently to review the matter. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140,
149 (1985). However, the Court agrees with the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge
set forth in the report and recommendation, which the Court adopts and incorporates by reference
herein. The Court notes, moreover, that defendants Maverick and Castenir have not appeared in the
case either in person or through counsel, they have not filed any responsive pleading or any other
papers with the Court since the commencement of this litigation, and their default was entered by
the Clerk of Court on October 27, 2015.
The Court further concludes that, although other claims remain pending against defendant
Rodney Scott Phelps, the injunctive and monetary relief sought by the government against the
defaulted defendants may be granted without implicating the claims against that defendant.
Moreover, there is good reason for the Court to issue a partial judgment now against the defaulted
defendants only, since the Court has ordered the proceedings against Phelps to be stayed
indefinitely, pending the outcome of the separate criminal proceedings against him in United States
of America v. Rodney Scott Phelps, No. 17-00036 (indictment filed on June 22, 2017). There has
been no suggestion that the criminal case against Phelps is likely to conclude in the imminent future,
and nothing in the record indicates that allowing the government to proceed toward securing its
remedies against the defaulted defendants would obstruct or interfere with the course of the criminal
case or the claims against Phelps in this matter. The Court finds, therefore, that there is no just
reason for delay in entry of a final judgment as to the defaulted defendants only in this case. See
Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b) (“When an action presents more than one claim for relief — whether as a
claim, counterclaim, crossclaim, or third-party claim — or when multiple parties are involved, the
court may direct entry of a final judgment as to one or more, but fewer than all, claims or parties
only if the court expressly determines that there is no just reason for delay.”).
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation [77]
is ADOPTED.
-2-
It is further ORDERED that the government’s motion for entry of default judgment against
defendants Maverick Asset Management, LLC and Jason Castenir [72] is GRANTED, and a
judgment against those defendants separately shall enter.
s/David M. Lawson
DAVID M. LAWSON
United States District Judge
Sitting by special designation
Dated: January 16, 2018
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?