Ford v. Lemelle et al

Filing 25

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and conducted a de novo review of the record. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. Accordingly, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 10 ) is GRANTED. All claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for Plaintiffs failure to exhaust her administrative remedies. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. The Court CERTIFIES that any appeal from th is Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by District Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 1/30/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
ELIZEBETH FORD,
Plaintiff,
v.
ROY LEMELLE and
BLAKE ROOSEVELT,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

NO. 3:15-cv-00930
JUDGE CRENSHAW

ORDER
Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, to
which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. No. 18.) On November 3, 2016, Plaintiff sent
a letter to the Court asking for more time to find counsel. (Doc. No. 23.) As of the date of this
Order, no counsel has entered an appearance for Plaintiff. The Court has reviewed the Report and
Recommendation and conducted a de novo review of the record. The Report and Recommendation
is ADOPTED.
Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 10) is GRANTED. All claims are
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust her administrative
remedies. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58.
The Court CERTIFIES that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) (2006).
IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________________________
WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE