Meadow et al v. NIBCO, Inc.

Filing 63

ORDER: Pending before the Court is Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss the Class Action Complaint (Docket No. 31 ). For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, Defendant's Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Plaintiffs shall file an Amended Complaint by June 15, 2016, alleging only those claims which remain in this action. IT IS SO ORDERED Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 5/24/2016. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION CHAD MEADOW, et al. ) ) ) NO. 3-15-1124 ) JUDGE CAMPBELL ) v. NIBCO, INC. ORDER Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Partial Motion to Dismiss the Class Action Complaint (Docket No. 31). For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff Meadow’s tort and warranty claims are DISMISSED without prejudice to being reasserted as theories under his TPLA claim. Plaintiff McLaughlin’s strict liability claim is DISMISSED without prejudice to being reasserted as a theory under his AEMLD claim. The breach of express warranty claims of all Plaintiffs are DISMISSED. Plaintiff McLaughlin’s claim for breach of implied warranty is DISMISSED. All claims for products liability as to PEX fittings are DISMISSED, except for Plaintiffs Plisko’s one claim in paragraph 37 of the Complaint. All claims for products liability as to PEX clamps are DISMISSED. All claims for pre-sales failures to warn are DISMISSED. Plaintiffs Plisko’s claim for post-sales failures to warn are DISMISSED. To the extent Plaintiff McLaughlin has asserted a claim for negligent marketing, that claim is DISMISSED. Any claims to recover the costs of an allegedly defective product itself or the costs of repair or replacement of such a product are DISMISSED. The unjust enrichment claims of Plaintiffs McLaughlin and Plisko are DISMISSED. Plaintiffs Plisko’s SCUTPA claim is DISMISSED. Any separate cause of action for declaratory and/or injunctive relief is DISMISSED. The Plaintiffs shall file an Amended Complaint by June 15, 2016, alleging only those claims which remain in this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. ___________________________________ TODD J. CAMPBELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?