Hammonds v. W.C. Jail Medical Staff et al
Filing
67
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: On August 8, 2016, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 57), to which no timely objections have been filed1. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss filed by defendant Kevin Boyd (Docket No. 28 ) is GRANTED, and all claims in this action against defendant Boyd are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Any appeal from this Order would notbe certifie d as taken in good faith. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 8/29/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(eh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
ERIC T. HAMMONDS,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
W.C. JAIL MEDICAL STAFF, ET AL.,
Defendants.
Civil No. 3:15-cv-1141
Judge Trauger
ORDER
On August 8, 2016, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket
No. 57), to which no timely objections have been filed1. The Report and Recommendation is
therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For
the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss filed by
defendant Kevin Boyd (Docket No. 28) is GRANTED, and all claims in this action against
defendant Boyd are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Any appeal from this Order would not
be certified as taken in good faith.
It is so ORDERED.
ENTER this 29th day of August 2016.
________________________________
ALETA A. TRAUGER
U.S. District Judge
1
The court does not interpret the document filed by the pro se plaintiff on August 24,
2016 entitled “Deliberate Indifference” (Docket No. 66) as objections to this Report and
Recommendation, as the document filed relates to three totally different defendants.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?