Burgos et al v. JBS Carriers, Inc. et al

Filing 54

ORDER AND STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL: Any and all claims against Doe Defendants D, E, and F, which were or could have been raised in this action, including the claims embodied in the Complaint and Amended Complaint, be, and the same hereby are, dismissed with prejudice. It is further ORDERED that there shall not be an award of attorneys' fees, expenses, or costs to any party. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 11/6/17. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION JUAN BURGOS and KRISTI COLE, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, v. DOE DEFENDANTS D, E, and F, Defendants. Case No. 3:15-cv-01415 Judge Crenshaw Magistrate Judge Holmes JURY DEMAND ORDER AND STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiffs Juan Burgos and Kristi Cole, as evidenced by the signatures of counsel below, state that all matters and issues in controversy which were or could have been raised by and between Doe Defendants D, E, and F in connection with the above-captioned case have been resolved, and do hereby stipulate to the dismissal of this action with prejudice. Counsel for Juan Burgos and Kristi Cole, by virtue of their signatures below, have verified Plaintiffs’ compliance with T.C.A. § 71-5-117(g) and confirm there are no known TennCare subrogation claims of the State of Tennessee or any entity acting pursuant to T.C.A. § 71-5-117(f) that remain unaddressed in this action. Counsel for Juan Burgos and Kristi Cole, by virtue of their signatures below, hereby advise and represent that any Medicare liens, workers’ compensation liens, attorney’s liens, or other subrogation liens have been or will be satisfied. Counsel for Juan Burgos and Kristi Cole further verify that there are no hospital liens of record and/or which remain unsatisfied pursuant to T.C.A. § 29-22-101, et seq. 1 Further, the parties stipulate that each party shall bear their own attorney's fees, expenses, and costs. All matters at issue have been resolved and the parties stipulate to the entry of this Order dismissing this action with prejudice without an award of attorneys’ fees, expenses, or costs to any party. It is, therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that any and all claims against Doe Defendants D, E, and F, which were or could have been raised in this action, including the claims embodied in the Complaint and Amended Complaint, be, and the same hereby are, dismissed with prejudice. It is further ORDERED that there shall not be an award of attorneys’ fees, expenses, or costs to any party. It is so ORDERED. _________________________________ Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw Jr. Respectfully submitted and approved for entry, s/ William B. Hicky William B. Hicky (TN Bar #25452) 3102 West End Avenue, Suite 400 Nashville, TN 37203 Telephone: (615) 324-8777 E-mail: will@hickylaw.com 2 s/ Thomas F. Mink Thomas F. Mink, II (TN Bar #06067) P.O. Box 198742 219 Second Avenue North, Suite 400 Nashville, TN 37219-8742 Telephone: (615) 256-0138 E-mail: tmink@minkdukelaw.com CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and exact copy of the foregoing was filed electronically through the Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system. Notice of this filing has been served via the CM/ECF system upon the following: Mr. Thomas F. Mink, III P.O. Box 198742 219 Second Avenue North, Suite 400 Nashville, TN 37219-8742 tmink@minkdukelaw.com Mr. Gary R. Wilkinson 7100 Commerce Way, Suite 290A Brentwood, TN 37027 wilking2@nationwide.com Mr. W. W. Frank Wilbert (TN Bar #23090) Mr. C. Joseph Hubbard (TN Bar #29226) 222 Second Ave. North, Suite 340-M Nashville, TN 37201 frank.wilbert@kaygriffin.com joseph.hubbard@kaygriffin.com On this the 3rd day of November, 2017. /s/ William B. Hicky William B. Hicky 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?