Otis v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County, TN, et al
Filing
50
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 34 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 44 Motion to Strike. The jury trial remains set for November 14, 2017, and all deadlines in the Order setting the trial remain in ef fect. Accordingly, this case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge to conduct a Final Case Management Conference. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 10/17/2017. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ab)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
ROBERTA OTIS,
Plaintiff,
v.
METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT
OF NASHVILLE & DAVIDSON
COUNTY, TN, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
NO. 3:15-cv-01512
CHIEF JUDGE CRENSHAW
ORDER
For the reasons given in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, Metro’s Motion for
summary judgment (Doc. No. 34) is GRANTED with respect to Otis’s FLSA claim and DENIED
in all other respects. Metro’s Motion to Strike (Doc. No. 44) is GRANTED in part and DENIED
in part.
The jury trial remains set for November 14, 2017, and all deadlines in the Order setting
the trial remain in effect. (Doc. No. 18.) Prior to the pretrial conference, the Court encourages the
parties to continue discussing alternative dispute resolution possibilities, as well as admissions of
fact[s] or stipulations regarding the authenticity and admissibility of documents at trial. M.D.
TENN. L.R. 16.01(d)(6). Accordingly, this case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge to conduct
a Final Case Management Conference.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
____________________________________
WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR.
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?