Muse v. Pepper et al

Filing 23

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. No. 20.) The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and cond ucted a de novo review of the record. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) for Muse's failure to effect service of process and Rule 41(b) for his failure to prosecute and comply with the Courts Orders. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. The Court CERTIFIES that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 4/6/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(eh)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION MOHAMED MUSE, Plaintiff, v. SGT. PEPPER, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. 3:15-cv-01520 JUDGE CRENSHAW ORDER Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. No. 20.) The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and conducted a de novo review of the record. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) for Muse’s failure to effect service of process and Rule 41(b) for his failure to prosecute and comply with the Court’s Orders. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. The Court CERTIFIES that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). IT IS SO ORDERED. ____________________________________ WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?