Smith v. Robertson County TN Detention Ctr. et al
Filing
12
ORDER ADOPTING 7 Report and Recommendation. Upon review, the Court finds the Report and Recommendation to be well-founded and ADOPTS it in its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED without prejudice, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to CLOSE the case. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Nixon on 8/1/2016. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
ROBERT SMITH,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
ROBERTSON COUNTY, TN,
DETENTION CENTER, et al.,
Defendant.
No. 3:16-cv-0094
Judge Nixon
Magistrate Judge Holmes
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
ORDER
Plaintiff Robert Smith filed the present Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on
January 1, 2016. (Doc. No. 1.) On June 28, 2016, Magistrate Judge Holmes issued a Report and
Recommendation recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice due to
“Plaintiff’s failure to return service packets as directed by the Court and his failure to take any
steps to litigate his action.” (Doc. No. 7 at 2.) The Report and Recommendation provided that
either party could file an objection within fourteen days. (Id. at 22.) Neither party has filed an
objection.
Upon review, the Court finds the Report and Recommendation to be well-founded and
ADOPTS it in its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED without prejudice,
and the Clerk of the Court is directed to CLOSE the case.
It is so ORDERED.
Entered this the 1st day of August, 2016.
____________________________________
JOHN T. NIXON, SENIOR JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?