Cunningham v. Vanderbilt University, The et al

Filing 55

ORDER: Report and Recommendation 52 is ADOPTED. Accordingly, Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint 38 is GRANTED IN PART with respect to the intentional infliction of emotional distress claim, and DENIED IN PART in al l other respects. Plaintiff's intentional infliction of emotional distress claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(4)(A), Defendants shall serve a responsive pleading to the Amended Complaint within fourteen days of the date of this Order. Signed by District Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 3/21/17. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION CRAIG CUNNINGHAM, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. THE VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY, et al., Defendants. NO. 3:16-cv-00223 JUDGE CRENSHAW ORDER Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. No. 14.) The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and conducted a de novo review of the record. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. Accordingly, Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 38) is GRANTED IN PART with respect to the intentional infliction of emotional distress claim, and DENIED IN PART in all other respects. Plaintiff’s intentional infliction of emotional distress claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(4)(A), Defendants shall serve a responsive pleading to the Amended Complaint within fourteen days of the date of this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. ____________________________________ WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?