Prescott v. Louisville Ladder, Inc.

Filing 37

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. No. 33.) The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and cond ucted a de novo review of the record. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for Prescotts failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the Courts orders. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 2/3/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(eh)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
JERRY W. PRESCOTT,
Plaintiff,
v.
LOUISVILLE LADDER, INC.,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

NO. 3:16-cv-00240
JUDGE CRENSHAW

ORDER
Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, to
which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. No. 33.) The Court has reviewed the Report and
Recommendation and conducted a de novo review of the record. The Report and Recommendation
is ADOPTED.
Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE under Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 41(b) for Prescott’s failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the Court’s orders.
The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________________________
WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE