Sandidge et al v. Acumed, LLC

Filing 36

ORDER: Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. No. 33.) The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and conducted a de novo review of the record. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike (Doc. No. 24) is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 130/17. (am)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION PAULA SANDIDGE and KENT SANDIDGE, Plaintiffs, v. ACUMED, LLC, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. 3:16-cv-00376 JUDGE CRENSHAW ORDER Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. No. 33.) The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and conducted a de novo review of the record. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike (Doc. No. 24) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. ____________________________________ WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?