Taylor-Merideth v. Breese et al

Filing 75

ORDER: The Report and Recommendation 74 is ADOPTED. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 59 ) is DENIED. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 66 ) is GRANTED. The Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUD ICE. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 11/21/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ab)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
DORETHIA TAYLOR-MERIDETH,
Plaintiff,
v.
STEPHEN BREESE, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 3:16-cv-00612
CHIEF JUDGE CRENSHAW

ORDER
Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation from the Magistrate Judge (Doc. No.
74), recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 59)
and grant Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 66), dismissing the case. Plaintiff
did not file timely objections. After a de novo review, the Unopposed Report and Recommendation
is ADOPTED.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 59) is DENIED.
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 66) is GRANTED. The Complaint is
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 58.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________________________
WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR.
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE