Utley v. Social Security Administration
Filing
21
ORDER: The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 20 ) is ADOPTED AND AFFIRMED. Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment (Doc. No. 15 ) is GRANTED, the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED, and the matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 8/22/2017. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ab)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
GARY LYNN UTLEY, Sr. ,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 3:16-cv- 00732
JUDGE ALETA A. TRAUGER
Magistrat e Judge King
vs .
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
Def endant.
ORDER
This is an action instituted under the provisions of 42 U.S.C.
§§
405 (g), 1383 for review of a final decision of the Commissioner of
Social
Security
denying
Plaintiff's
application
for
supplemental
security income. On August 7, 2017, the United States Magistrate Judge
recommended that that Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment (Doc. No. 15) be
granted, that the decision of the Commissioner be reversed, and that
the matter be remanded to the Commissioner pursuant to Sentence 4 of
42 U.S.C.
§
405 (g) for further consideration of Plaintiff's residual
functional capacity. Report and Recommendation (Doc. 20). Although the
parties were advised of their right to object to that recommendation
and of the consequences of their failure to do so, there has been no
objection.
The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 20) is ADOPTED AND AFFIRMED.
Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment (Doc. No. 15) is GRANTED, the decision
of the Commissioner is REVERSED, and the matter is REMANDED to the
Commissioner,
pursuant
to Sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C.
§
405(g),
further consideration of Plaintiff's residual functional capacity.
It is so ORDERED.
ENTER this 22nd day of August 2017.
_________________________
ALETA A. TRAUGER
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
for
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?