Walker v. USA Swimming, Inc.

Filing 56

ORDER: Pending before the Court is Defendant USA Swimming, Inc.'s Rule 12(b) (1) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. (Docket No. 35 ). Petitioner Philip Mark Walker filed a Response in Opposition (Docket No. 50 ), and USA Swimming, Inc. replied (Docket No. 54 ). For the reasons explained in the accompanying Memorandum, the Court DENIES USA Swimming, Inc.'s 12(b)(1) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. (Docket No. 35 ). It is SO ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 3/1/2017. (hb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION PHILIP MARK WALKER, Petitioner/Plaintiff, v. USA SWIMMING, INC., a foreign corporation, Respondent/Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:16-0825 Judge Sharp ORDER Pending before the Court is Defendant USA Swimming, Inc.’s Rule 12(b)(1) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. (Docket No. 35). Petitioner Philip Mark Walker filed a Response in Opposition (Docket No. 50), and USA Swimming, Inc. replied (Docket No. 54). For the reasons explained in the accompanying Memorandum, the Court DENIES USA Swimming, Inc.’s 12(b)(1) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. (Docket No. 35). It is SO ORDERED. ____________________________________ KEVIN H. SHARP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE  

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?