Walker v. USA Swimming, Inc.
Filing
56
ORDER: Pending before the Court is Defendant USA Swimming, Inc.'s Rule 12(b) (1) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. (Docket No. 35 ). Petitioner Philip Mark Walker filed a Response in Opposition (Docket No. 50 ), and USA Swimming, Inc. replied (Docket No. 54 ). For the reasons explained in the accompanying Memorandum, the Court DENIES USA Swimming, Inc.'s 12(b)(1) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. (Docket No. 35 ). It is SO ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 3/1/2017. (hb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
PHILIP MARK WALKER,
Petitioner/Plaintiff,
v.
USA SWIMMING, INC., a foreign
corporation,
Respondent/Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 3:16-0825
Judge Sharp
ORDER
Pending before the Court is Defendant USA Swimming, Inc.’s Rule 12(b)(1) Motion to
Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. (Docket No. 35). Petitioner Philip Mark
Walker filed a Response in Opposition (Docket No. 50), and USA Swimming, Inc. replied
(Docket No. 54). For the reasons explained in the accompanying Memorandum, the Court
DENIES USA Swimming, Inc.’s 12(b)(1) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter
Jurisdiction. (Docket No. 35).
It is SO ORDERED.
____________________________________
KEVIN H. SHARP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?