Bond v. Chadwick

Filing 39

ORDER: The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and conducted a de novo review of the record. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. Accordingly, Defendants' unopposed Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution (Doc. No. 32 ) is G RANTED. The Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 6/9/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ab)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION JOSEPH F. BOND, JR., Plaintiff, v. CHADWICK MYATT, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. 3:16-cv-00863 CHIEF JUDGE CRENSHAW ORDER Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 38), to which no Objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and conducted a de novo review of the record. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. Accordingly, Defendants’ unopposed Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution (Doc. No. 32) is GRANTED. The Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. The Court CERTIFIES that an appeal taken in forma pauperis from this Order would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) (2012). IT IS SO ORDERED. ____________________________________ WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR. CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?