Dotson v. Social Security Administration

Filing 28

ORDER: Before the court is plaintiff Brianna Dotson's objection (Doc. 25) to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (R&R) (Doc. 22), recommending that plaintiff's motion for judgment on the administrative record (Doc. 1 3) be DENIED and that the Social Security Commissioner's denial of benefits be AFFIRMED. Following a de novo review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and as provided in the memorandum entered contemporaneously herewith, plaintiff&# 039;s objection (Doc. 25) is OVERRULED, and the court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's R&R (Doc. 22) as the Courts findings of fact and conclusions of law. This order constitutes final judgment in this action for purposes of Rule 58, Fed. R. Civ. P. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 9/12/2017. (jw)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
BRIANNA A. DOTSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
ACTING COMMISSIONER
OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 3:16-cv-00997
Judge Trauger/Brown

ORDER
Before the court is plaintiff Brianna Dotson’s objection (Doc. 25) to the Magistrate Judge’s
Report and Recommendation (R&R) (Doc. 22), recommending that plaintiff’s motion for judgment
on the administrative record (Doc. 13) be DENIED and that the Social Security Commissioner’s
denial of benefits be AFFIRMED. Following a de novo review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1),
and as provided in the memorandum entered contemporaneously herewith, plaintiff’s objection (Doc.
25) is OVERRULED, and the court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s R&R (Doc.
22) as the Court’s’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.
This order constitutes final judgment in this action for purposes of Rule 58, Fed. R. Civ. P..
It is so ORDERED.
ENTER this 12th day of September 2017.

Aleta A. Trauger
United States District Judge