Brent v. The Precheck Company et al

Filing 136

ORDER: The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation 129 and concludes that it should be adopted and approved. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice 113 is DENIED. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 10/3/18. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(gb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
GREG BRENT,
Plaintiff,
v.
PRECHECK, INC.,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

NO. 3:16-cv-01747
JUDGE CAMPBELL
MAGISTRATE JUDGE
FRENSLEY

ORDER
Pending before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation on
Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice (Doc. No. 113), which was filed on September 5,
2018. (Doc. No. 129). In the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends
Plaintiff’s motion be denied because allowing Plaintiff to dismiss without prejudice and re-file his
action would result in unfair treatment to Defendants.
The Report and Recommendation advised the parties that any objections were to be filed
within fourteen days of service, and no objections were filed.
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and concludes that it should be
adopted and approved. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice is DENIED.
It is so ORDERED.
____________________________________
WILLIAM L. CAMPBELL, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE