Green v. United States of America

Filing 23

ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, Petitioner's Motion (Docket No. 1 ) is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 3/27/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION

DANIEL W. GREEN
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

)
)
)
)
)

No. 3:16-01858
CHIEF JUDGE SHARP

ORDER
Pending before the Court is a Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 To Vacate, Set Aside, Or
Correct Sentence (Docket Nos. 1, 8), filed by the Movant/Petitioner, pro se. The Government has
filed a Response (Docket No. 18) in opposition to the Motion.
For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, Petitioner’s Motion (Docket
No. 1) is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED.
This Order shall constitute the judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58.
Should the Petitioner give timely notice of an appeal from this Memorandum and Order,
such notice shall be treated as a application for a certificate of appealability, 28 U.S.C. 2253(c),
which will not issue because the Petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial
of a constitutional right. Castro v. United States, 310 F.3d 900 (6th Cir. 2002).
It is so ORDERED.

______________________________
KEVIN H. SHARP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE