Green v. United States of America
ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, Petitioner's Motion (Docket No. 1 ) is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 3/27/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
DANIEL W. GREEN
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CHIEF JUDGE SHARP
Pending before the Court is a Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 To Vacate, Set Aside, Or
Correct Sentence (Docket Nos. 1, 8), filed by the Movant/Petitioner, pro se. The Government has
filed a Response (Docket No. 18) in opposition to the Motion.
For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, Petitioner’s Motion (Docket
No. 1) is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED.
This Order shall constitute the judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58.
Should the Petitioner give timely notice of an appeal from this Memorandum and Order,
such notice shall be treated as a application for a certificate of appealability, 28 U.S.C. 2253(c),
which will not issue because the Petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial
of a constitutional right. Castro v. United States, 310 F.3d 900 (6th Cir. 2002).
It is so ORDERED.
KEVIN H. SHARP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?