Morrow v. Community Health Systems, Inc.
Filing
83
ORDER: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, CHS' 74 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff's claims for breach of contract, intentional interference with contractual relations, and civil con spiracy against CHS are DISMISSED. CHS' Motion to Compel Arbitration is DENIED as moot. The initial case management conference is RESET before JudgeTrauger on November 2, 2017 at 3:00 p.m. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 10/17/2017. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ab)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
DONALD MORROW,
Plaintiff
v.
COMMUNITY HEALTH
SYSTEMS, INC., et al.
Defendants
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
NO. 3-16-cv-1953
JUDGE TRAUGER
ORDER
Pending before the court is Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss First
Amended Complaint or, in the Alternative, to Compel Arbitration (Docket No. 74). Plaintiff has filed
a brief in opposition to the Motion (Docket No. 78), and CHS has filed a Reply (Docket No. 80) and
supplemental authority (Docket No. 81). For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum,
CHS’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff’s claims for breach
of contract, intentional interference with contractual relations, and civil conspiracy against CHS are
DISMISSED. CHS’ Motion to Compel Arbitration is DENIED as moot.
Plaintiff’s remaining unjust enrichment claim against CHS and claims against the other
Defendants will go forward. The initial case management conference is RESET before Judge
Trauger on November 2, 2017 at 3:00 p.m.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
ENTER this 17th day of October 2017.
___________________________________
ALETA A. TRAUGER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?