Morrow v. Community Health Systems, Inc.

Filing 83

ORDER: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, CHS' 74 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff's claims for breach of contract, intentional interference with contractual relations, and civil con spiracy against CHS are DISMISSED. CHS' Motion to Compel Arbitration is DENIED as moot. The initial case management conference is RESET before JudgeTrauger on November 2, 2017 at 3:00 p.m. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 10/17/2017. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ab)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION DONALD MORROW, Plaintiff v. COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC., et al. Defendants ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. 3-16-cv-1953 JUDGE TRAUGER ORDER Pending before the court is Community Health Systems, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint or, in the Alternative, to Compel Arbitration (Docket No. 74). Plaintiff has filed a brief in opposition to the Motion (Docket No. 78), and CHS has filed a Reply (Docket No. 80) and supplemental authority (Docket No. 81). For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, CHS’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff’s claims for breach of contract, intentional interference with contractual relations, and civil conspiracy against CHS are DISMISSED. CHS’ Motion to Compel Arbitration is DENIED as moot. Plaintiff’s remaining unjust enrichment claim against CHS and claims against the other Defendants will go forward. The initial case management conference is RESET before Judge Trauger on November 2, 2017 at 3:00 p.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. ENTER this 17th day of October 2017. ___________________________________ ALETA A. TRAUGER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?