Jackson v. Omni Vision, Inc.
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 11 , filed April 18, 2017) is ADOPTED as this Court's findings of fact and conclusions of law. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant' s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 9 ) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Visiting Chief Judge Denise Page Hood on 5/16/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
Case No. 3:16-cv-02074
Hon. Denise Page Hood
OMNI VISION, INC.,
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
AND DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
This matter comes before the Court on Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley’s
Report and Recommendation. [Docket No. 11] Plaintiff, proceeding in pro per, filed
this action on August 5, 2016, alleging that Defendants violated his rights under the
Title VII. On September 7, 2016, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss. Although the
Court ordered Plaintiff to file a response, no response was filed. On April 18, 2017,
the Magistrate Judge filed the Report and Recommendation, wherein he recommends
that the Court dismiss Plaintiff’s cause of action, with prejudice, pursuant to Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Neither party filed an objection to the Report and
The Court has had an opportunity to review this matter and finds that the
Magistrate Judge reached the correct conclusions for the proper reasons. Finding no
error in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, the Court adopts the
Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Furthermore, as neither party has raised
an objection to the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that the parties have
waived any further objections to the Report and Recommendation. Smith v. Detroit
Fed’n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987) (a party’s failure
to file any objections waives his or her right to further appeal); Thomas v. Arn, 474
U.S. 140, 149 (1985).
For the reasons stated above,
IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [Docket No. 11, filed
April 18, 2017] is ADOPTED as this Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [Docket
No. 9] is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITH
DATED: May 16, 2017
s/Denise Page Hood
DENISE PAGE HOOD
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
SITTING BY SPECIAL DESIGNATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?