Moore v. Jones et al

Filing 35

ORDER adopting 32 Report and Recommendations and granting 31 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 10/10/17. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(gb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION BENNY JOE MOORE, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER J. W. JONES, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:16-cv-02389 Chief Judge Crenshaw ORDER Magistrate Judge Brown has entered a Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 32) recommending that this action be dismissed with prejudice because of Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute and to obey Court Orders. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. Having conducted the de novo review required by Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court agrees with the recommended disposition. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 32) is hereby ADOPTED, and Defendant’s “Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute and Failure to Comply With Court Order” (Doc. No. 31) is GRANTED. This case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Any appeal of this dismissal will not be certified as taken in good faith. The Clerk of the Court shall enter a final judgment in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clerk shall also TERMINATE as pending all remaining Motions (Doc. Nos. 28, 29, 33). It is SO ORDERED. __________________________________________ WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR. CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?