Unice v. Social Security Administration
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Following a de novo review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and as provided in the memorandum entered contemporaneously herewith, plaintiff's objections ( 30 ) are OVERRULED, and the court ACCEPT S and ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's R&R ( 29 )as the Court's findings of fact and conclusions of law. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 9/12/17. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(gb)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
SUSAN K. UNICE,
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Before the court is plaintiff Susan Unice’s objections (Doc. 30) to the Magistrate Judge’s
Report and Recommendation (R&R) (Doc. 29), recommending that plaintiff’s motion for judgment
on the administrative record (Doc. 18) be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, the
Commissioner’s decision be AFFIRMED IN PART and REVERSED IN PART, and this action
be REMANDED for further consideration and explanation regarding the overpayment of benefits
to plaintiff and her daughter. Following a de novo review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and as
provided in the memorandum entered contemporaneously herewith, plaintiff’s objections (Doc. 30)
are OVERRULED, and the court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s R&R (Doc. 29)
as the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.
This order constitutes final judgment in this action for purposes of Rule 58, Fed. R. Civ. P..
It is so ORDERED.
ENTERED this 12th day of September, 2017.
Aleta A. Trauger
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?