Medlock v. United States of America

Filing 30

ORDER DISMISSING CASE: Pending before the court are the Petitioner's pro se Motion To Vacate, Set Aside, Or Correct Sentence (Docket No. 1 ) and supporting briefs (Docket Nos. 2 , 12 ); and the Government's Responses (Docket No. 8 , 24 ). For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, the Motion To Vacate (Docket No. 1) is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED. This Order shall constitute the judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 7/11/2017. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION

KATHY MEDLOCK,
Petitioner
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 3:16-cv-02603
Judge Trauger

ORDER
Pending before the court are the Petitioner’s pro se Motion To Vacate, Set Aside, Or
Correct Sentence (Docket No. 1) and supporting briefs (Docket Nos. 2, 12); and the
Government’s Responses (Docket No. 8, 24).
For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, the Motion To Vacate
(Docket No. 1) is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED.
This Order shall constitute the judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58.
If the Petitioner gives timely notice of an appeal from the court’s ruling, such notice shall
be treated as a application for a certificate of appealability, 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), which will not
issue because the Petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a
constitutional right. Castro v. United States, 310 F.3d 900 (6th Cir. 2002).
It is so ORDERED.
ENTER this 11th day of July 2017.
______________________________
ALETA A. TRAUGER
U.S. District Judge