Cunningham v. Rapid Capital Funding, LLC/RCF et al

Filing 117

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: On July 24, 2017, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (DE # 114 ), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the defendants' Motions to Dismiss the plaintiff's earlier Complaints (Docket Nos. 31 , 35 , 50 , 90 ) are hereby TERMINATED as moot. The defendants have 28 days within which to answer or move to dismiss the plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (Docket No. 55 ). This case is returned to the magistrate judge for further handling under the original referral order. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 8/17/17. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (gb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION CRAIG CUNNINGHAM, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) RAPID CAPITAL FUNDING, LLC/RCF, ET AL., ) ) Defendants. ) Civil No. 3:16-cv-02629 Judge Trauger ORDER On July 24, 2017, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (DE #114), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the defendants’ Motions to Dismiss the plaintiff’s earlier Complaints (Docket Nos. 31, 35, 50, 90) are hereby TERMINATED as moot. The defendants have 28 days within which to answer or move to dismiss the plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (Docket No. 55). This case is returned to the magistrate judge for further handling under the original referral order. It is so ORDERED. ENTER this 17th day of August 2017. ________________________________ ALETA A. TRAUGER U.S. District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?