Cunningham v. Rapid Capital Funding, LLC/RCF et al

Filing 158

ORDER concerning award of damages on Default Judgment. (xc:Pro se party by certified mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(JBB)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION CRAIG CUNNINGHAM, Plaintiff, v. RAPID CAPITAL FUNDING, LLC/RCF, et al., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. 3:16-cv-02629 JUDGE RICHARDSON MAGISTRATE JUDGE BROWN ORDER The Plaintiff in this matter has been granted a default against the defendant, Gateway Sales and Marketing, LLC (DE 154) and the matter has been referred to me to determine whether a hearing is necessary on the damages or alternatively to determine the amount of damages. The Plaintiff was directed to file by December 30, 2019 an affidavit or declaration with appropriate documentation and file a brief as to the amount of damages to which the Plaintiff asserts he is entitled. The Plaintiff instead of following these directions filed a Motion for Default Judgment (DE 156) which asserts there were thirty (30) calls which are entitled to statutory damages of $3,000.00 per call. 47 U.S.C. ยง 227. Although the Plaintiff did not file a more detailed statement or brief, the defaulting Defendant has filed nothing in opposition. Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge does not believe a hearing is necessary on the matter and the Court should grant the Plaintiff a Judgment in the amount of $90,000.00. /// /// /// 1 /// Any objection to such an award should be filed with the Clerk within fourteen (14) days of the entry of this order. SO, ORDERED. /s/ Joe B. Brown______________ Joe B. Brown United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?