Doe v. Haslam et al

Filing 38

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 10 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 26 Motion to Dismiss. Defendants shall file a responsive pleading to each Complaint within fourteen days of the date of this Order. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 11/9/2017. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ab)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION JOHN DOE and JOHN DOE #2 Plaintiffs, v. WILLIAM E. HASLAM, Governor of the State of Tennessee, and MARK GWYN, Director of the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation, in their official capacities, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. 3:16-cv-02862 & 3:17-cv-00264 CHIEF JUDGE CRENSHAW ORDER Before the Court are Motions to Dismiss (Doc Nos. 10 & 26) filed by Defendants Governor William E. Haslam and Tennessee Bureau of Investigation Director Mark Gwyn in two cases that have been consolidated for the purposes of case management, discovery, and pretrial motions. For the reasons explained in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, the Motions are hereby GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Count 2, 3, 6, and 7 of each Complaint is DISMISSED. Counts 8 and 9 will be DISMISSED only insofar as they challenge Tennessee’s restrictions on where Plaintiffs may obtain treatment, and Defendants’ requests to dismiss those claims and Count 1 will otherwise be DENIED. Defendants shall file a responsive pleading to each Complaint within fourteen days of the date of this Order. FED. R. CIV. P. 12(a)(4)(A). IT IS SO ORDERED. ____________________________________ WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR. CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?