Cato v. Social Security Administration

Filing 19

ORDER: Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation from the Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 18), recommending the Court affirm the final decision of the Commissioner. Plaintiff did not file timely objections. After a de novo review of the record, t he Court agrees that the ALJ applied the correct legal standards and substantial evidence supports the ALJ's decision. Blakely v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 581 F.3d 399, 405-06 (6th Cir. 2009) (citing Key v. Callahan, 109 F.3d 270, 273 (6th C ir. 1997)). The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Record (Doc. No. 15) is DENIED. The final decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 4/19/2018. (am)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION BARBARA ANN CATO, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:17-cv-00382 CHIEF JUDGE CRENSHAW ORDER Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation from the Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 18), recommending the Court affirm the final decision of the Commissioner. Plaintiff did not file timely objections. After a de novo review of the record, the Court agrees that the ALJ applied the correct legal standards and substantial evidence supports the ALJ’s decision. Blakely v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 581 F.3d 399, 405-06 (6th Cir. 2009) (citing Key v. Callahan, 109 F.3d 270, 273 (6th Cir. 1997)). The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Record (Doc. No. 15) is DENIED. The final decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. IT IS SO ORDERED. ____________________________________ WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR. CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?