Hamby v. Dr. Hernandez et al

Filing 105

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 104 MOTION to Add Suit to Class Certification filed by William D. Hamby, Jr. For the reasons stated herein, the undersigned recommends that Mr. Hamby be granted the relief requested and this action be dismissed to the extent that he is a member of the class defined by Chief Judge Crenshaw in Charles Graham v. Russell L. Davis, 3:16-cv-1954. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffery S. Frensley on 5/14/18. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(gb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION

WILLIAM D. HAMBY, JR
Plaintiff,
V.
MOLLY O’TOOLE, et al.
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civil No. 3:17-cv-00629
Judge Trauger/Frensley

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Pending before the court is the Plaintiff’s Motion (Dual) to Notify Court of Change of
Address/Motion to Add Suit to Class Certification. Docket No. 104. Specifically, he asks “to
include suit #3:17-cv-00629, to class certification suit #3:16-cv-1954, to save court resources as
issue of suits are same. thanks.” Id. For the reasons stated herein, the undersigned recommends
that Mr. Hamby be granted the relief requested and this action be dismissed to the extent that he
is a member of the class defined by Chief Judge Crenshaw in Charles Graham v. Russell L.
Davis, 3:16-cv-1954 (M. D. Tenn.)(Crenshaw, Chief Judge, Presiding).
Mr. Hamby is a prisoner in the Tennessee Department of Correction who suffers with
Hepatitis C. (Docket No. 1) He brought this action and at least one other, William D. Hamby Jr.
v. Tony Parker, et al., 3:17-cv-1480, (Crenshaw, J.) asserting claims under the Eighth
Amendment for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs based on treatment and
medication for Hepatitis C. In the pending action before Chief Judge Crenshaw, the clerk was
directed to provide Mr. Hamby with a copy of the docket sheet in the matter of in Charles
Graham v. Russell L. Davis, as well as the Court’s Order and Memorandum, granting the
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification and defining the class in that matter. Hamby Jr. v. Tony

Parker, et al., 3:17-cv-1480, Docket No. 12. The purpose of providing the Order and
Memorandum regarding the Motion for Class Certification was so that Mr. Hamby could
determine whether he is already a member of the class defined by Chief Judge Crenshaw in
Docket No. 33 of the Graham case. Id. Mr. Hamby was likewise advised that “even if the
Plaintiff is a member of the Graham class, the Plaintiff may elect to opt out of the class and
instead proceed on his own in this action.”
In Graham, Chief Judge Crenshaw defined the class as follows:
All persons currently incarcerated in any facility under the supervision or
control of the Tennessee Department of Corrections or persons incarcerated in a
public or privately owned facility for whom the Tennessee Department of
Corrections has ultimate responsibility for their medical care and who have at
least 90 days or more remaining to serve on their sentences and are either
currently diagnosed with Hepatitis C infection or are determined to have Hepatitis
C after a screening test has been administered by the Department of Corrections.
Graham, 3:16-cv-01954 (Docket No. 33).
Mr. Hamby has now filed the instant motion in this action indicating his desire to
“include” this action in the Graham matter and asserts that the issues in the two cases “are the
same.” Docket No. 104.
Mr. Hamby has been previously provided with the Orders entered in the Graham case by
Chief Judge Crenshaw identifying the class at issue in that case as well as advising Plaintiff of
his ability to opt out of the class and proceed on his own if he chooses to do so. Having
reviewed the Orders regarding the class certification in Graham as well as understanding his
ability to opt out of the class, Mr. Hamby asserts in this matter he wishes to be a part of the class
in Graham and that the issues he is asserting in this matter and those asserted in Graham are the
same. Therefore, the undersigned recommends that the instant action be dismissed insofar as Mr.
Hamby has requested that his claims be included in the Graham action and he is already a

2

member of the class defined by Chief Judge Crenshaw in that matter.
Under Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, any party has fourteen (14)
days from receipt of this Report and Recommendation in which to file any written objections to
this Recommendation with the District Court. Any party opposing said objections shall have
fourteen (14) days from receipt of any objections filed in this Report in which to file any
response to said objections. Failure to file specific objections within fourteen (14) days of
receipt of this Report and Recommendation can constitute a waiver of further appeal of this
Recommendation. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 106 S.Ct. 466, 88 L.Ed. 2d 435 (1985), reh’g
denied, 474 U.S. 1111 (1986).

JEFFERY S. FRENSLEY
U. S. District Magistrate Judge

3