Ray v. Davidson County Sheriff's Office et al

Filing 47

ORDER: After a de novo review of the record, the Court agrees that the Defendants' respective motions should be granted, and the action dismissed with prejudice, and therefore the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 46 ) is ADOPTED. According ly, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 40 ) and Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 42 ) are GRANTED. The instant action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 12/4/2018. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
LAWRENCE RAY,
Plaintiff,
v.
DAVIDSON COUNTY SHERIFF’S
OFFICE, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 3:17-cv-00963
CHIEF JUDGE CRENSHAW

ORDER
Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation from the Magistrate Judge,
recommending that the Court grant (1) James Beachboard and the Davidson County Sheriff’s
Office’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 40); and (2) ABL Food Service and Benji Ayang’s Motion
for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 42). (Doc. No. 46.) Further, the Magistrate Judge recommends
dismissing the action with prejudice. (Id.) No objections have been filed to the Magistrate Judge’s
Report and Recommendation. After a de novo review of the record, the Court agrees that the
Defendants’ respective motions should be granted, and the action dismissed with prejudice, and
therefore the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 46) is ADOPTED.
Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 40) and Motion for Summary
Judgment (Doc. No. 42) are GRANTED. The instant action is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________________________
WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR.
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE