Bennett et al v. SRB Transport, Inc. et al
Filing
6
ORDER: This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in accordance with Local Rule 16.01. The parties shall develop a plan for resolution of the case that includes at least two independent attempts to resolve the case. The first attempt shall occur within 120 days of the initial case management conference and the second attempt shall occur before the deadline for filing dispositive motions. The parties are encouraged to consider the Alternative Dispute Resolution options provided in Local Rule 16.02 through 16.07. This case shall be set for trial upon completion of the initial case management conference by order of the District Judge in accordance with the procedures of Local Rule 16.01(d)(5). Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 7/27/17. (am)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
BENJAMIN K. BENNETT and
DAWN BENNETT,
Plaintiffs,
v.
SRB TRANSPORT, INC., and
GORAN RADOJEVIC,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
NO. 3:17-cv-01046
CHIEF JUDGE CRENSHAW
ORDER
This case is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for customized case management in
accordance with Local Rule 16.01.
The parties shall develop a plan for resolution of the case that includes at least two
independent attempts to resolve the case. The first attempt shall occur within 120 days of the
initial case management conference and the second attempt shall occur before the deadline for
filing dispositive motions.
The parties are encouraged to consider the Alternative Dispute
Resolution options provided in Local Rule 16.02 through 16.07.
This case shall be set for trial upon completion of the initial case management conference
by order of the District Judge in accordance with the procedures of Local Rule 16.01(d)(5).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
____________________________________
WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR.
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?