Villasana v. Pittman

Filing 36

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; granting 26 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendations re 33 Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED , and Pittman's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 26) is GRANTED. Villasana's instant § 1983 action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 1/7/2019. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
JULIO VILLASANA,
Plaintiff,
v.
YOLANDA PITTMAN,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

NO. 3:17-cv-001062
CHIEF JUDGE CRENSHAW

ORDER
Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 33)
recommending that Pittman’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 26) be granted and
Villasana’s instant § 1983 action be dismissed for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies.
No objections have been filed to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. Upon de
novo review in accordance with Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court agrees
with the recommended disposition because the undisputed facts show that Villasana has not
exhausted his administrative remedies. (See Doc. No. 33 at 6-12.) Accordingly, the Magistrate
Judge’s Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED, and Pittman’s Motion for
Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 26) is GRANTED. Villasana’s instant § 1983 action is
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________________________
WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR.
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE