Gore v. Core Civic Inc. et al
Filing
89
ORDER: After a de novo review of the record, the Court agrees that the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment should be granted and the action dismissed with prejudice, and therefore the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 88) is ADOPTED. Ac cordingly, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 70) is GRANTED. The instant action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 11/6/2018. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(am) Modified Date on 11/7/2018 (am).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
MARK GORE,
Plaintiff,
v.
CORE CIVIC, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 3:17-cv-1082
CHIEF JUDGE CRENSHAW
ORDER
Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation from the Magistrate Judge,
recommending that the Court grant Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 70) and
dismiss the action with prejudice. (Doc. No. 88.) No objections have been filed to the Magistrate
Judge’s Report and Recommendation. After a de novo review of the record, the Court agrees that
the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment should be granted and the action dismissed with
prejudice, and therefore the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 88) is ADOPTED.
Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 70) is GRANTED.
The instant action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
____________________________________
WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR.
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?