Whitworth v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al

Filing 101

ORDER: The Report and Recommendation 94 is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining O rder and Preliminary Injunction (Docket No. 8) is DENIED. This case remains on referral to the magistrate judge for further handling under the original referral order. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 9/11/18. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
JAMES C. WHITWORTH,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
CORECIVIC, INC., ET AL.,
Defendants.

Civil No. 3:17-cv-01121
Judge Trauger

ORDER
On August 15, 2018, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation
(DE #94), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is
therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For
the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiff’s Motion for Temporary
Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (Docket No. 8) is DENIED. This case remains on
referral to the magistrate judge for further handling under the original referral order.
It is so ORDERED.
ENTER this 11th day of September 2018.
________________________________
ALETA A. TRAUGER
U.S. District Judge