Meckstroth Brown v. Social Security Administration et al
Filing
19
ORDER: The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 18) is APPROVED AND ADOPTED. The Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 15) is DENIED and the final decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. This is a final order. The Clerk shal l issue an appropriate judgment under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and close the file. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 6/25/2018. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
DANA D. MECKSTROTH BROWN,
Plaintiff,
v.
COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
NO. 3:17-cv-01147
CHIEF JUDGE CRENSHAW
ORDER
Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 18) in which the
Magistrate Judge recommends denying the Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Administrative
Record (Doc. No. 15) and affirming the decision of the Commissioner to deny Plaintiff’s
application for benefits. No objection has been timely filed despite specific instructions that were
provided to Plaintiff in the Report and Recommendation.
The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation and agrees with the
Magistrate Judge’s careful analysis. The ALJ’s decision is supported by substantial evidence and
Plaintiff has not offered persuasive argument to the contrary. Accordingly, the Report and
Recommendation (Doc. No. 18) is APPROVED AND ADOPTED. The Motion for Judgment on
the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 15) is DENIED and the final decision of the Commissioner
is AFFIRMED.
This is a final order. The Clerk shall issue an appropriate judgment under the Federal Rules
of Civil Procedure and close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
____________________________________
WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR.
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?