Olivier v. Hicks et al
Filing
17
ORDER: The City of Clarksville's Unopposed Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 12 ) is GRANTED. All claims against the City of Clarksville are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. All claims against Leigh Black are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJ UDICE for insufficient service. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. The Court CERTIFIES that an appeal taken in forma pauperis from this Order would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 6/6/18. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
MARDOCHE OLIVIER,
Plaintiff,
v.
ROSS H. HICKS, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 3:17-cv-01300
CHIEF JUDGE CRENSHAW
ORDER
Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation, recommending that the Court grant the
City of Clarksville’s Unopposed Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. No. 15.) It further
recommended that Leigh Black be dismissed from the Complaint for insufficient service. (Id.) No
timely objections have been filed. After a de novo review, the Report and Recommendation is
ADOPTED.
Accordingly, the City of Clarksville’s Unopposed Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc.
No. 12) is GRANTED. All claims against the City of Clarksville are DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE. All claims against Leigh Black are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for
insufficient service. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. The Court CERTIFIES that an appeal taken in forma pauperis
from this Order would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
____________________________________
WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR.
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?