Seabrooks v. Core Civic et al

Filing 61

ORDER: The court construes the plaintiff's motion as a motion to voluntarily dismiss this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). The motion is hereby GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Consequently, the motions to dismiss (Doc. No. 57) and to stay discovery (Doc. No. 59) filed by defendant f/n/u Taylor are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 7/23/2019. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION SHAIRIQ SEABROOKS, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. CORE CIVIC, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 3:17-cv-01328 Judge Trauger ORDER The pro se plaintiff has filed a “Motion to Withdraw re Complaint” in which he states that he “it would be detrimental to the plaintiff to continue to prosecute this action.” (Doc. No. 60 at 1). The court construes the plaintiff’s motion as a motion to voluntarily dismiss this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). The motion is hereby GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Consequently, the motions to dismiss (Doc. No. 57) and to stay discovery (Doc. No. 59) filed by defendant f/n/u Taylor are DENIED AS MOOT. This is the final order denying all relief in this case. The Clerk SHALL enter judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(b). It is so ORDERED. ____________________________________ Aleta A. Trauger United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?