Sharifa (Morton) v. Wells Fargo/ASC
Filing
77
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 76 is APPROVED and ADOPTED. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 52 is GRANTED, Defendant's Motion to Strike 72 is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. This Order constitutes a final judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, and the Clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 8/3/2021. (xc: Pro se party by regular mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(kc)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
SHAUNEILLE SHARIFA (MORTON),
Plaintiff,
v.
WELLS FARGO/ASC,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 3:17-cv-01400
ORDER
Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc.
No. 76) recommending that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 52) be granted, that
Defendant’s Motion to Strike (Doc. No. 72) be denied, and that this action be dismissed with
prejudice. No objections have been filed. If there are no objections, the district court is not required
to review the R&R de novo, and should “adopt the magistrate’s findings and rulings to which no
specific objection is filed.” Benson v. Walden Sec., No. 3:18-cv-0010, 2018 WL 6322332, at *3
(M.D. Tenn. Dec. 4, 2018) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985)); see also Frias v. Frias,
No. 2:18-cv-00076, 2019 WL 549506, at *2 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 12, 2019).
The Court has nonetheless reviewed the R&R and the file in accordance with Rule 72 of
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation (Doc. No. 76) is APPROVED and ADOPTED. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss
(Doc. No. 52) is GRANTED, Defendant’s Motion to Strike (Doc. No. 72) is DENIED, and this
action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. This Order constitutes a final judgment pursuant to
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, and the Clerk is directed to close the file.
Case 3:17-cv-01400 Document 77 Filed 08/03/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 573
IT IS SO ORDERED.
____________________________________
WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR.
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Case 3:17-cv-01400 Document 77 Filed 08/03/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 574
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?