Payne v. Genovese et al
Filing
120
ORDER: The R&R (Doc. No. 116) is APPROVED AND ADOPTED, and Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 107) is DENIED. This case is hereby RETURNED to the Magistrate Judge for further case management. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 1/16/20. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(vh)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
LARRY PAYNE,
Plaintiff,
v.
KEVIN GENOVESE, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 3:17-cv-01410
ORDER
Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc.
No. 116) recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
(Doc. No. 107). No timely objections to the R&R have been filed.
Having thoroughly reviewed the R&R, the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s
analysis. Specifically, the Court agrees that Plaintiff “has not carried his initial burden to
demonstrate the absence of any genuine disputes of material fact by pointing to particular evidence
in the record.” (Doc. No. 116 at 5-6.)
Accordingly, the R&R (Doc. No. 116) is APPROVED AND ADOPTED, and Plaintiff’s
Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 107) is DENIED. This case is hereby
RETURNED to the Magistrate Judge for further case management.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
____________________________________
WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR.
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?