Ingram Barge Company, LLC v. Musgrove

Filing 24

ORDER: The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff's Notice, and the file. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 22 ) is ADOPTED and APPROVED. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. No. 14 ) and the supplement to that Motion (Doc. No. 18 ) are DENIED. The Court's prior entry of default (Doc. No. 13 ) is SET ASIDE, and Plaintiff is provided fourteen additional days from entry of this Order to serve the Complaint on Defendant Musgrove. Signed by District Judge Eli J. Richardson on 3/14/2019. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
INGRAM BARGE CO., LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
STEVE R. MUSGROVE, JR.,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

NO. 3:17-cv-01526
JUDGE RICHARDSON

ORDER
Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc.
No. 22). Plaintiff, the only party properly before the Court at this time, has filed a Notice of Waiver
of Objections to the Report and Recommendation and Request for Entry of Order (Doc. No. 23).
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff’s Notice, and the file.
The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 22) is ADOPTED and APPROVED. Accordingly,
Plaintiff’s1Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. No. 14) and the supplement to that Motion (Doc.
No. 18) are DENIED. The Court’s prior entry of default (Doc. No. 13) is SET ASIDE, and
Plaintiff is provided fourteen additional days from entry of this Order to serve the Complaint on
Defendant Musgrove.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
___________________________________
ELI RICHARDSON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1

The Report and Recommendation mistakenly identifies the Motion for Default Judgment as
“Musgrove’s,” which is simply a clerical error.