McKee v. CTEL NO.1, LLC et al

Filing 59

ORDER: Pending before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 35 ) recommending that Defendant Clifford Spence be dismissed without prejudice. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and concludes that it should be ADOPTED. Accordingly, Defendant Clifford Spence is DISMISSED, without prejudice. Signed by District Judge William L. Campbell, Jr on 5/10/2019. (xc: Copy of this Order mailed to: Clifford Spence 1714 Kimmerling Lane Austin, TX 78758.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(mg) Modified text on 5/10/2019 (mg).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION MARIAN C. MCKEE, Plaintiff, v. CTEL NO. 1, LLC and CLIFFORD SPENCE, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. 3:17-cv-01566 JUDGE CAMPBELL MAGISTRATE JUDGE FRENSLEY ORDER Pending before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 35) recommending that Defendant Clifford Spence be dismissed without prejudice. On April 4, 2019, the Magistrate Judge ordered Plaintiff to show cause within seven days for not serving Defendant Spence within the time required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). (Doc. No. 34.) Plaintiff did not comply with the Order and the Magistrate Judge recommended that Defendant Spence be dismissed without prejudice. The Report and Recommendation advised the parties that any objections to the Magistrate Judge’s findings were to be filed within fourteen days of service. (Doc. No. 35.) No objections were filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and concludes that it should be ADOPTED. Accordingly, Defendant Clifford Spence is DISMISSED, without prejudice. It is so ORDERED. ____________________________________ WILLIAM L. CAMPBELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?