Turner v. Parker et al
Filing
176
ORDER: On July 2, 2020, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 175), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of la w of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, the following are hereby ORDERED: The Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendant Kavin Johnson, M.D. (Docket No. 145) is GRANTED. The Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc ket No. 116) and Supplemental Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Docket No. 149) are DENIED. All other pending motions by any party are hereby DENIED AS MOOT. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. This Order constitutes the judgment in this case. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 7/23/2020. (xc:Pro se party by regular mail. ) (am)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
RANDALL TURNER,
Plaintiff,
v.
TONY PARKER, ET AL.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil No. 3:18-cv-00003
Judge Trauger
ORDER
On July 2, 2020, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation
(Docket No. 175), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and
Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law
of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, the following are hereby ORDERED:
1.
The Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendant Kavin Johnson,
M.D. (Docket No. 145) is GRANTED.
2.
The Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Docket No. 116)
and Supplemental Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Docket No. 149)
are DENIED.
3.
All other pending motions by any party are hereby DENIED AS MOOT.
4.
This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
This Order constitutes the judgment in this case.
It is so ORDERED.
________________________________
ALETA A. TRAUGER
U.S. District Judge
Case 3:18-cv-00003 Document 176 Filed 07/23/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 841
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?